| Rural Upper Egypt\n========================================================================================================\nFor detailed information on the regions and governorates used in the ELMPS 2018 Sample, see: \nKrafft, C., Assaad, R., and Rahman, K. (2019) . Introducing the Egypt Labor Market Panel Survey 2018. Economic Research Forum Working Paper No. 1360\nhttps:\/\/erf.org.eg\/publications\/introducing-the-egypt-labor-market-panel-survey-2018\/\n=======================================================================","analysis_unit":"1- Households.\n2- Individuals.\n3- Enterprises.","universe":"The survey covered a national sample of households and all households members aged 6 and above. In addition to Enterprises operated by the household.","data_kind":"Sample survey data [ssd]","notes":"The topics covered by the survey included:\n\n\nParental background, education, housing, access to services, residential mobility, migration and remittances, time use, marriage patterns and costs, fertility, women\u2019s decision making and empowerment, job dynamics, savings and borrowing behavior, the operation of household enterprises and farms, besides the usual focus on employment, unemployment and earnings in typical labor force surveys. ELMPS 2018 also provided more detailed information on health, gender role attitudes, food security, hazardous work, community infrastructure and the cost of housing. It incorporated specific questions on vulnerability, coping strategies and access to social safety net programs. (Krafft, C., Assaad, R., and Rahman, K. ,2019)\n\nIn addition to the survey\u2019s panel design, which permits the study of various phenomena over time, the survey also contains a large number of retrospective questions about the timing of major life events such as education, residential mobility, jobs, marriage and fertility. The survey provides detailed information about place of birth and subsequent residence, as well information about schools and colleges attended at various stages of an individual\u2019s trajectory, which permit the individual records to be linked to information from other data sources about the geographic context in which the individual lived and the educational institutions s\/he attended."},"method":{"data_collection":{"data_collectors":[{"name":"Central Agency For Public Mobilization & Statistics","abbreviation":"CAPMAS","affiliation":""}],"sampling_procedure":"\"As a longitudinal survey, the ELMPS attempts to track households included in the previous waves and interview all their remaining and new members. The survey also tries to locate any individuals who may have split from these households between waves, and attempts to interview them, as well as any other individuals found in the households they formed or joined.\n\nIn every wave of the survey, a refresher sample of 2,000-3,000 households is added to maintain the representativeness of the overall sample and to allow for a more in-depth examination of phenomena of interest. The focus we selected for the 2018 wave of the ELMPS was economic vulnerability among Egypt's poorest communities. Accordingly, we added a refresher sample of 2,000 households that oversampled rural communities that were among the \"1,000 poorest villages\" of Egypt, as ascertained by the most recent national poverty map available to us.\n\nThe final sample included 15,746 households and 61,231 individuals. Of these households, 13,793 households included members from 2012 (10,042 panel and 3,751 split households) and 1,953 were refresher households. Among individuals, 53,040 were in households that included at least one individual interviewed in 2012 (i.e., either panel or split households), while 8,191 were in refresher households. Of the 49,186 individuals included in the 2012 sample, 39,153 (79.6%) were successfully re-interviewed in 2018. \n\nOf the 37,140 individuals in the 2006 sample, 22,901 (61.7%) were successfully tracked over three waves. Finally, of the 23,997 individuals included in the 1998 wave, 10,145 (42.3%) were successfully tracked over four waves. We present a detailed discussion of sample attrition patterns in Section 2 and the creation of weights to address such attrition in Section 3. We also discuss the design of the refresher sample and the calculation of the weights for it. In the subsequent section, we compare the (weighted) results of the ELMPS on key demographic and labor market indicators to those of other data sources, namely Egypt's 2017 Census and various rounds of the LFS. First, however, we discuss the design of the questionnaires, sample, and fielding practices.\" (Krafft, C., Assaad, R., and Rahman, K. ,2019)\n\n=======================================================================\nFor details on The Pattern of Attrition from 2012 to 2018, see:\nKrafft, C., Assaad, R., and Rahman, K. (2019) . Introducing the Egypt Labor Market Panel Survey 2018. Economic Research Forum Working Paper No. 1360\nhttps:\/\/erf.org.eg\/publications\/introducing-the-egypt-labor-market-panel-survey-2018\/\n=======================================================================","coll_mode":"Face-to-face [f2f]","research_instrument":"\"Each wave of the survey attempts to maintain consistency for the indicators measured in previous waves while adding additional modules and questions to examine new issues or allow more in-depth examination of existing issues. Accordingly, the 2018 wave devoted more attention to the measurement of the instability of employment, focusing in particular on job turnover among casual workers. It also provided more detailed information on health, gender role attitudes, food security, hazardous work, community infrastructure and the cost of housing. It incorporated specific questions on vulnerability, coping strategies and access to social safety net programs.\n\nThe 2018 wave has two primary questionnaires, a household questionnaire and an individual questionnaire. The modules in these two questionnaires are; \n\nA) The household questionnaire includes; Statistical Identification; Tracking Splits, Individual Roster; Housing Information; Current Migrants; Transfers from Individuals; Other Sources of Income; Shocks and Coping; Household Non-Farm Activities; Agriculture Assets: Lands; Agriculture Assets: Livestock\/Poultry; Agriculture Assets: Equipment; Agricultural Crops and Other Agricultural Income.\n\nB) The individual questionnaire includes; Statistical Identification; Residential Mobility; Father's Characteristics; Mother's Characteristics; Siblings; Health; Education; Past Seven Days Subsistence & Domestic Work; Employment in the Past Seven Days; Unemployment; Employment in the Past Three Months; Characteristics of Main Job; Secondary Job; Labor Market History; Marriage; Fertility; Female Employment; Earnings; Earnings in Secondary Job; Return Migration; Information Technology; Savings & Borrowing and Attitudes. \n\nThey are for the most part the same as those in the previous waves of the survey with a few exceptions. The \u201ctracking splits\u201d module in the household questionnaire allows interviewers to ascertain whether the composition of the household has changed since the 2012 wave and inquire about new members present in the household as well as those who may have split to form new households. The \u201cshocks and coping module\u201d is also new in the 2018 wave and enquires about both idiosyncratic and community level shocks that the household may have been exposed to, household food security, and coping mechanisms that the household may have used to respond to shocks. The main changes in the individual questionnaire relative to the 2012 wave were a substantial expansion of the health module, a reconfiguration of the labor market history module to better capture past periods of non-employment7 and the addition of a module on attitudes.\" (Krafft, C., Assaad, R., and Rahman, K. ,2019)","coll_situation":"Based on experience from past surveys, we eschewed a distinct enumeration round (a phase of locating and listing individuals interviewed in the previous wave prior to fielding). From our experience in the 2012 wave, we found that the data from the enumeration phase could not simply be used directly in fielding, as individuals may have split between enumeration and fielding, and locating households twice added to cost, time, and attrition. In fielding the ELMPS 2012, 1,680 individuals who were enumerated in 2011 were simply not found in the main fieldwork phase in 2012, and we lacked information on whether they split together, died, moved abroad, or otherwise (Assaad and Krafft 2013). A similar problem arose in Jordan in 2016, where, although we designed the questionnaire to track splits at fielding as well as enumeration, many such splits were not actually fielded, leading to the loss of 616 split households and 647 individuals from the sample (Krafft and Assaad 2018). Instead of implementing a separate enumeration phase, data on the status of all 2012 members was collected as part of the main fieldwork in 2018. We processed the data regularly (multiple times per week) throughout fielding to extract split households that needed to be tracked and added them to the server database for fielding. This dynamic process also allowed us to track repeat splits, i.e., cases where individuals split together, but once located, were found to have further sub-divided into additional new households. (Krafft, C., Assaad, R., and Rahman, K. ,2019)","weight":"The starting point for weights for the 2018 sample was their household weights in 2012. These weights were adjusted to account for Type I attrition. The weights of split households were derived from their 2012 households, but account for Type II attrition as well as whether any other households may have merged (i.e., share adjustment for component households). These 19 weights are the panel weights, which were brought together with the weights for the refresher sample (which were based on refresher sample design) and then expanded to the national population. \n\n\n\n \n=============================================================================================\nFor details on the creation of sample weights, see:\nKrafft, C., Assaad, R., and Rahman, K. (2019) . Introducing the Egypt Labor Market Panel Survey 2018. Economic Research Forum Working Paper No. 1360\n======================================================================="}},"data_access":{"dataset_use":{"conf_dec":[{"txt":"To access the micro-data, researchers are required to register on the ERF website and comply with the data access agreement. \n\nThe data will be used only for scholarly, research, or educational purposes. Users are prohibited from using data acquired from the Economic Research Forum in the pursuit of any commercial or private ventures.","required":"yes","form_no":"","uri":""}],"contact":[{"name":"Economic Research Forum","affiliation":"Economic Research Forum (ERF)","email":"erfdataportal@erf.org.eg","uri":"www.erf.org.eg"}],"cit_req":"The users should cite the Economic Research Forum and Central Agency For Public Mobilization & Statistics as follows:\n\nOAMDI, 2024. Labor Market Panel Surveys (LMPS), http:\/\/erf.org.eg\/data-portal\/. Version 3.0 of Licensed Data Files; ELMPS 2018-Central Agency For Public Mobilization & Statistics (CAPMAS). Egypt: Economic Research Forum (ERF).","conditions":"Licensed datasets, accessible under conditions.","disclaimer":"The Economic Research Forum and the Central Agency For Public Mobilization & Statistics have granted the researcher access to relevant data following exhaustive efforts to protect the confidentiality of individual data. The researcher is solely responsible for any analysis or conclusions drawn from available data."}}},"schematype":"survey"} |